<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Humanoid Robotics Review</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/</link><description>Source-based analysis of humanoid hardware, embodied intelligence and the evidence behind useful, accountable physical work.</description><item><title>Atlas reaches the product stage, but the factory evidence still has to follow</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/electric-atlas-puts-the-hardware-question-back-on-the-factory-floor/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/electric-atlas-puts-the-hardware-question-back-on-the-factory-floor/</guid><description>Boston Dynamics' January 2026 launch moves beyond the electric prototype. Planned customer deployments, stage demonstrations and proven production work remain separate milestones.</description></item><item><title>Figure 03's redesigned hands make sensing part of the dexterity story</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/a-humanoid-hand-should-be-judged-by-the-objects-it-handles/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/a-humanoid-hand-should-be-judged-by-the-objects-it-handles/</guid><description>Figure links tactile sensing and palm cameras with Helix control. The test is whether the combined system handles varied objects and recovers from imperfect contact.</description></item><item><title>Digit 5 and Atlas take different routes to a longer working day</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/battery-life-is-only-part-of-a-humanoid-s-working-day/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/battery-life-is-only-part-of-a-humanoid-s-working-day/</guid><description>Agility emphasizes faster charging, while Boston Dynamics describes autonomous battery exchange. Neither approach alone determines productive uptime.</description></item><item><title>Atlas' industrial ambitions make walking a whole-job problem</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/walking-is-the-start-of-a-humanoid-s-mobility-test/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/walking-is-the-start-of-a-humanoid-s-mobility-test/</guid><description>Mobility matters because a robot must reach, carry and recover in spaces designed for people. The decisive test is the task completed at the end of the walk.</description></item><item><title>Helix 2.5 makes recovery part of the humanoid dexterity debate</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/dexterity-lives-in-the-second-attempt/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/dexterity-lives-in-the-second-attempt/</guid><description>Figure's September 2026 evaluation reports whole-body work in unfamiliar homes. Its most revealing question is how the robot responds when the first attempt is imperfect.</description></item><item><title>Digit 5 puts controlled stopping at the center of the humanoid product</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/safe-stopping-is-a-whole-body-problem/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/safe-stopping-is-a-whole-body-problem/</guid><description>Agility's new architecture includes people detection, independent motion oversight and a seated response. The safety case still belongs to the complete application.</description></item><item><title>Gemini Robotics shows why understanding a scene is not the same as controlling a body</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/what-vision-language-action-models-actually-add/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/what-vision-language-action-models-actually-add/</guid><description>DeepMind's embodied-reasoning releases separate interpretation from action. A humanoid still needs a dependable bridge from a useful plan to safe physical execution.</description></item><item><title>Figure's human-data strategy tests how far experience can transfer between bodies</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/shared-robot-data-does-not-make-bodies-interchangeable/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/shared-robot-data-does-not-make-bodies-interchangeable/</guid><description>Helix 2.5 uses human-experience pretraining, while shared robot datasets pursue another route. Both approaches still have to bridge differences in sensors, reach and action.</description></item><item><title>1X's Expert Mode makes the human service behind a home robot explicit</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/teleoperation-is-a-training-method-and-a-service-dependency/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/teleoperation-is-a-training-method-and-a-service-dependency/</guid><description>NEO's product model includes scheduled remote guidance for unfamiliar chores. That changes how autonomy, privacy and the cost of completed work should be described.</description></item><item><title>GXO's Digit deployment gives the humanoid debate a concrete unit of work</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/gxo-s-digit-agreement-puts-a-concrete-task-ahead-of-the-general-purpose-promise/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/gxo-s-digit-agreement-puts-a-concrete-task-ahead-of-the-general-purpose-promise/</guid><description>The commercial programme began with a defined material-handling task. Digit 5's broader ambitions should be assessed separately from that operating record.</description></item><item><title>Figure 03 at BMW moves the test from body-shop handling to logistics</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/bmw-s-figure-03-project-changes-the-task-so-the-evidence-must-change-too/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/bmw-s-figure-03-project-changes-the-task-so-the-evidence-must-change-too/</guid><description>BMW's June 2026 project and Figure's account describe a new task context. Earlier Figure 02 experience is useful history, but it does not validate the new workflow automatically.</description></item><item><title>NEO's home-service model reveals why factory success does not settle domestic autonomy</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/why-a-factory-success-does-not-settle-the-home-robot-question/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/why-a-factory-success-does-not-settle-the-home-robot-question/</guid><description>A household combines unfamiliar objects, privacy and changing instructions. 1X's use of basic autonomy and scheduled expert help makes those differences visible.</description></item><item><title>Digit's commercial model puts completed work ahead of the robot's sticker price</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/the-price-of-a-humanoid-is-not-the-cost-of-completed-work/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/the-price-of-a-humanoid-is-not-the-cost-of-completed-work/</guid><description>GXO's deployment and the Digit 5 roadmap show why unit cost alone cannot describe humanoid economics. Support, utilization and task reliability decide the result.</description></item><item><title>Agility and FORT bring the maintenance shift into the humanoid safety story</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/a-humanoid-safety-case-must-include-the-maintenance-shift/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/a-humanoid-safety-case-must-include-the-maintenance-shift/</guid><description>The October 2026 partnership describes manual overrides and external safety interfaces. Those details matter when a robot is being set up, repaired or recovered.</description></item><item><title>Helix, Digit and Atlas show why humanoid claims need different scorecards</title><link>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/how-to-read-a-humanoid-performance-claim/</link><guid>https://humanoidroboticsreview.com/articles/how-to-read-a-humanoid-performance-claim/</guid><description>A home evaluation, a commercial handling task and a product launch each provide evidence. Reading them as the same kind of milestone produces misleading conclusions.</description></item></channel></rss>